TradingView Glitch Sends Bitcoin Dominance Below 25%

A TradingView glitch in data briefly showed crypto’s market cap at $6 trillion and Bitcoin dominance at 24%. Bitcoin’s price did not move, and sentiment data still points to fear.

A TradingView glitch on Monday, November 9, made it look as if the crypto market had more than doubled and Bitcoin dominance had collapsed. Ash Crypto shared the charts on X, showing total market cap at $6.17 trillion and Bitcoin dominance at 24.14%. The post asked whether the “glitch” was predicting a bull run.

How the Glitch Distorted Bitcoin Dominance

Both charts show the same pattern. Total market cap jumps in a single candle from roughly $2.5 trillion to $6.17 trillion, while Bitcoin dominance falls from around 60% to 24.14% in one candle. Real rallies build across many candles, so a vertical spike points to bad data rather than trading.

TradingView builds its total from the 125 largest coins, and dominance is Bitcoin’s value divided by that total. The total suddenly jumped above $6 trillion while Bitcoin itself never moved. The numbers agree. At the $75,140 price in a BitcoinFear post, Bitcoin’s market cap is roughly $1.5 trillion, and 24.14% of $6.17 trillion is about $1.49 trillion. Bitcoin’s value was stable, but the total was wrong.

The error stemmed from a temporary inflation of the total cryptocurrency market capitalization figure on the platform, which at one point displayed a total above $6 trillion. Because Bitcoin dominance is calculated as Bitcoin’s market cap divided by the overall market total, the artificially high denominator caused the dominance percentage to collapse on the chart—even though Bitcoin’s actual price and market value had not changed in any corresponding way.

The misleading chart quickly circulated on social media. Some traders and observers initially interpreted the sharp drop as a signal that capital was rapidly rotating out of Bitcoin into altcoins. Comments ranged from excitement about an imminent “altseason” to questions about whether the data reflected real market moves or a platform error.

Reliable data sources quickly contradicted the TradingView reading. CoinMarketCap continued to show Bitcoin dominance near 60.3%. Altcoin Season Index readings from CoinMarketCap and CoinGlass remained in the 40–44 range (well below the threshold typically associated with a broad altcoin outperformance phase). These figures indicate that Bitcoin has continued to hold or slightly increase its share of the overall market in recent sessions.

TradingView had not issued a public explanation by the time of the initial reports. The incident serves as a reminder of the risks of relying on a single data source, particularly for metrics that can swing dramatically when underlying totals are miscalculated.

Real Market Data Shows No Surge

Over the weekend, another tracker had the total crypto market near $2.56 trillion, with Bitcoin holding 59.3% of it. A separate report put the total at $2.45 trillion, with Bitcoin dominance rising to 60.2% as investors moved out of altcoins. Figures differ slightly by tracker and timing, but none come close to $6 trillion.

At 2:00 AM on November 9, the BitcoinFear account posted the Bitcoin Fear and Greed Index at 29, in the “Fear” zone, with Bitcoin at $75,140. A market worth $6 trillion would hardly register fear. The index measures sentiment and is not a forecast, but it matches the real price action rather than the glitch.

A Familiar Pattern, Not a Bull Run Signal

This TradingView glitch has a precedent. In December 2024, an error showed Bitcoin dominance at 0%, which panicked traders. Bitcoin dipped about 4% on the false data.

Traders should cross-check CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap before reacting to a viral chart. A genuine altseason needs a sustained fall in Bitcoin dominance alongside real inflows, not a single candle. This article is not financial advice.

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.